Erratum: Institutional and individual factors influencing urinary tract infections and pressure injuries in Korean nursing home residents: A multilevel analysis of National Health Insurance Service Data

Article information

J Korean Gerontol Nurs. 2026;28(1):122-123
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 February 27
doi : https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2025.00185.e1
1Associate Research Fellow, Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea
2Research Fellow, Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Korea
Corresponding author: Jung Suk Lee Health Insurance Research Institute, National Health Insurance Service, 32 Geongang-ro, Wonju 26464, Korea TEL: +82-33-736-2816 E-mail: fjslee@nhis.or.kr
Received 2026 January 13; Accepted 2026 January 13.

J Korean Gerontol Nurs Vol. 27 No. 4, 349-363

https://doi.org/10.17079/jkgn.2025.00185

Some of the values in Table 6 of the published paper have been modified. The OR and 95% CI in the Female row, Model 1 column are replaced from 1.16, 1.12~1.20 to 0.73, 0.69~0.78. The OR and 95% CI in the Intercept row, Model 1 column are replaced from 0.03, 0.39~0.50 to 0.02, 0.01~0.03 (indicated in bold).

The revised Table is below.

Multivariate Models With Institutional-Level Variables Associated With Pressure Injury

We apologize for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused and appreciate your understanding.

Notes

Conflict of interest

No existing or potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Article information Continued

Table 6.

Multivariate Models With Institutional-Level Variables Associated With Pressure Injury

Model 1*
Model 2
OR 95% CI p-value OR 95% CI p-value
Individual characteristics
 Female 0.73 0.69~0.78 <.001 0.73 0.69~0.78 <.001
 Age 1.00 1.00~1.00 .55 1.01 1.00~1.01 <.001
 Economic eligibility (ref: NBLS)
  Medical aid 1.02 0.90~1.16 .73 1.12 0.91~1.38 .30
  Reduced 0.82 0.79~0.86 <.001 0.71 0.66~0.76 <.001
  General 0.92 0.89~0.95 <.001 0.89 0.84~0.95 <.001
 LTC approval grade (ref: grade 5)
  Grade 4 1.17 1.02~1.36 .03 1.09 0.77~1.53 .63
  Grade 3 1.67 1.44~1.92 <.001 2.05 1.47~2.86 <.001
  Grade 2 2.36 2.04~2.72 <.001 4.27 3.06~5.97 <.001
  Grade 1 3.02 2.61~3.50 <.001 8.34 5.96~11.68 <.001
 CCI score 1.09 1.07~1.11 <.001 1.09 1.05~1.12 <.001
 Months of stay 1.03 1.03~1.03 <.001 1.00 0.99~1.00 .30
Institutional characteristics
 Ownership (ref. individual+others)
  Corporate 0.85 0.78~0.92 <.001
  Public 0.80 0.67~0.97 .02
 Location (ref: rural)
  Mid-sized city 1.00 0.91~1.10 .97
  Metropolitan city 1.09 0.98~1.21 .10
 Number of licensed beds (ref: <30 beds)
  30~99 beds 1.04 0.96~1.13 .31
  ≥100 beds 0.97 0.84~1.12 .68
 Portion of residents with LTC grade 1 or 2 0.79 0.64~0.98 .03
 RN staffing (yes) 1.00 0.92~1.09 .97
 Contracted physician visits 1.01 0.99~1.02 .24
 Number of affiliated institutions 1.01 0.94~1.09 .71
 Additional staffing (yes) 1.06 0.99~1.15 .10
 LTCF evaluation rating (ref: E)§
  D 0.98 0.87~1.10 .72
  C 0.92 0.82~1.03 .13
  B 0.86 0.77~0.97 .02
  A 0.84 0.74~0.97 .01
 LTCF evaluation indicator #35 (Pressure Injury Prevention) 0.88 0.82~0.95 <.001
Intercept 0.02 0.01~0.03 <.001 0.02 0.01~0.03 <.001
Random effect
 Institutional level 0.12 0.11~0.13 - 0.40 0.36~0.45 -
ICC (%) 0.12 0.11~0.13 - 0.11 0.10~0.12 -
LR test 4,600.73 <.001 1,019.67 <.001
AIC 55,908.52 55,850.46
BIC 56,034.81 56,132.17
*

It includes only individual-level variables;

It incorporates both individual- and organizational-level variables;

Levels 1 and 5 indicate the highest and lowest LTC needs, respectively;

§

‘A’ indicates the highest quality, ‘E’ indicates the lowest quality; AIC=Akaike Information Criterion; BIC=Bayesian Information Criterion; CCI=Charlson Comorbidity Index; CI=Confidence interval; ICC=Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; LR test= Likelihood-ratio test; LTC=Long-term care; LTCF=Long-term care facility; NBLS=National basic livelihood security; OR=Odds ratio; ref.=Reference; RN=Registered nurse.